🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.